During the late 90s, the concept was modified by Michael Eysenck, a British psychology researcher, to refer to the hedonic treadmill theory which compares the pursuit of happiness to a person on a treadmill, who has to keep working just to stay in the same place.
Theory
Humans rapidly adapt to their current situation, becoming habituated to the good or the bad. We are more sensitive to our relative status: both that which we recently have and that which we perceive others to enjoy.
Bottan and Perez Truglia in "Deconstructing the Hedonic Treadmill" (2008)[1] propose a model to explain the emergence of adaptive stimuli. They also test their hypotheses running dynamic happiness regressions.
Details
Despite the fact that external forces are constantly changing our life goals, happiness for most people is a relatively constant state. Regardless of how good things get, people always report about the same level of happiness.
The theory that the baseline of an individual's happiness is at least partially genetic is bolstered by the fact that identical twins are usually equally prone to depression.
The hedonic treadmill theory is related to the Easterlin paradox, which states that rich people are no happier than poor people. The theory supports the argument that money does not buy happiness and that the pursuit of money as a way to reach this goal is futile. Good and bad fortunes may temporarily affect how happy a person is, but most people will end up back at their normal level of happiness.
No comments:
Post a Comment