Perplexity explains Self-dealing in politics

 

 Self-dealing in politics

Answer

Self-dealing in politics refers to situations where elected officials or government employees use their positions of power for personal gain rather than serving the public interest. This practice is considered unethical and often illegal, as it undermines the principles of democratic governance and public trust.

Some common examples of self-dealing in politics include:

Awarding government contracts to companies owned by family members or close associates1.

Using insider information gained through political office for personal financial benefit.

Directing public funds or resources to projects that directly benefit the politician's private business interests.

Accepting gifts or favors from individuals or organizations seeking to influence policy decisions.

Creating laws or policies that provide special advantages to the politician's personal investments or business ventures.

Self-dealing in politics is particularly problematic because it violates the fiduciary duty that elected officials have to their constituents. Just as in the private sector, where fiduciaries are expected to act in the best interest of their clients, politicians are expected to prioritize the public good over their personal interests.

To combat self-dealing, many jurisdictions have implemented ethics laws, disclosure requirements, and conflict of interest regulations. These measures aim to increase transparency and accountability in government operations. However, the complexities of modern governance and the often-blurred lines between public and private interests continue to make self-dealing a persistent challenge in political systems worldwide.

Related

How does self-dealing impact public trust in politics

What are some historical examples of self-dealing in politics

How are self-dealing actions typically detected in political circles

What legal consequences can politicians face for self-dealing

How does self-dealing differ between political and corporate contexts

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/msft-rWUd3VlgTC6XtmAdeyxB0A

Gemini explains Self-dealing in politics

 

Self-dealing in politics

Self-dealing in politics refers to a situation where a politician or public official uses their position and power for personal gain, often at the expense of the public interest. It involves a conflict of interest where the official's personal interests (financial, familial, etc.) influence their decisions and actions in their official capacity.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

Key Characteristics of Self-Dealing in Politics:

Conflict of Interest: The core element is a conflict between the official's duty to act in the best interest of the public and their personal interest. This interest could be direct financial gain, indirect benefits to their family or friends, or even enhancing their own power and influence.

Abuse of Power: The official uses their authority, access to information, and decision-making power derived from their public position to benefit themselves.

Lack of Transparency: Self-dealing often involves secrecy and attempts to conceal the official's personal interest and the benefits they are receiving.

Violation of Trust: It's a breach of the public's trust and the ethical standards expected of public officials. The public expects officials to act impartially and in the best interest of the community.

Personal Gain: The ultimate goal is to obtain some form of personal advantage, whether it's money, property, preferential treatment, or increased power.

Examples of Self-Dealing in Politics:

Nepotism and Cronyism: Hiring unqualified family members or friends into public positions.

Insider Trading: Using confidential information gained through their official position to make profitable investments.

Bribery and Kickbacks: Accepting money or other favors in exchange for granting contracts, licenses, or favorable treatment.

Using Public Funds for Personal Expenses: Diverting public money for personal travel, entertainment, or home improvements.

Steering Contracts to Companies They Own or Have a Financial Interest In: Influencing the awarding of government contracts to businesses in which the official has a stake.

Voting on Legislation That Directly Benefits Their Holdings: Participating in legislative decisions that directly increase the value of their personal assets or business interests.

Accepting Gifts or Favors That Could Influence Their Decisions: Allowing gifts or benefits to sway their judgment on policy matters.

Using Official Resources for Political Campaigns: Using government staff, equipment, or information to support their own or their party's election efforts.

Consequences of Self-Dealing:

Corruption: It erodes public trust in government and fuels corruption.

Inefficiency: It leads to inefficient allocation of resources and poor decision-making.

Inequality: It exacerbates inequality by allowing those in power to enrich themselves at the expense of ordinary citizens.

Undermining Democracy: It weakens democratic institutions and processes.

Legal Penalties: It can result in criminal charges, fines, and imprisonment.

Political Damage: It can lead to the official's resignation, impeachment, or defeat in future elections.

Combating Self-Dealing:

Strong Ethics Laws: Enacting clear and comprehensive ethics laws that define conflicts of interest and prohibit self-dealing.

Transparency and Disclosure: Requiring officials to disclose their financial interests and potential conflicts of interest.

Independent Oversight Bodies: Establishing independent ethics commissions or watchdog agencies to monitor officials' conduct and investigate allegations of self-dealing.

Robust Enforcement: Enforcing ethics laws vigorously and holding officials accountable for violations.

Free Press: Ensuring a free and independent press that can investigate and report on potential cases of self-dealing.

Public Awareness and Education: Raising public awareness of the dangers of self-dealing and encouraging citizens to demand accountability from their elected officials.

Campaign Finance Reform: Reducing the influence of money in politics.

Revolving Door Restrictions: Limiting the ability of former officials to lobby their former colleagues or work for companies they previously regulated.

Self-dealing is a serious problem that undermines good governance and public trust. It's essential to have strong laws, institutions, and a culture of accountability to prevent and address it.

Chat GPT clarifies Self-dealing in politics

 

Self-dealing in politics happens when politicians use their position for personal gain instead of serving the public interest. This can take many forms, such as:

Financial Corruption – Using government funds, contracts, or policies to benefit themselves, family, or friends.

Insider Trading – Making stock trades based on privileged government information.

Nepotism and Cronyism – Appointing unqualified friends or family to key positions.

Policy Manipulation – Passing laws or regulations that serve personal business interests.

Lobbyist Influence – Favoring corporate donors over constituents in policymaking.

It erodes trust in government, increases inequality, and often leads to policies that benefit the few at the expense of the many.

Are you thinking about a specific case or just the general issue?

Donald Trump 

ChatGPT said:

Donald Trump has faced numerous allegations and controversies related to self-dealing during his time in office and beyond. Some key areas where critics have accused him of self-enrichment include:

1. Business Conflicts of Interest

Unlike previous presidents, Trump refused to fully divest from his businesses, instead placing them in a trust run by his sons. Critics argue this allowed him to continue benefiting financially from government decisions.

Foreign governments and lobbyists frequently booked rooms at Trump-owned hotels, particularly the Trump International Hotel in D.C., potentially as a way to gain favor with his administration.

2. Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Concerns

The Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibits federal officials from receiving financial benefits from foreign governments. Lawsuits alleged that Trump violated this by profiting from business dealings with foreign officials.

His properties reportedly hosted events and received payments from groups with interests in government policy.

3. Government Spending at Trump Properties

Trump often traveled to his own golf resorts and hotels, with taxpayers footing the bill for Secret Service and staff accommodations.

The U.S. military was found to have stayed at Trump properties in Scotland, raising further ethics concerns.

4. COVID-19 Relief & Business Ties

Some businesses tied to Trump allies and family members received Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, raising concerns about favoritism.

There were questions about his administration’s vaccine contracts and whether political connections influenced decisions.

5. Post-Presidency Business Deals & Legal Fundraising

Trump’s post-presidency fundraising, including the “Stop the Steal” campaign, raised hundreds of millions of dollars, with reports suggesting much of the money was used for personal legal expenses rather than election integrity efforts.

His media ventures and political PACs continue to raise funds, often from small-dollar donors, with some questioning where the money is going.

Of course, Trump and his supporters argue that these criticisms are politically motivated, and he has never been convicted of corruption-related crimes.

Are you interested in a specific aspect of his dealings, or just an overall discussion?

 

You said: 

specifics

ChatGPT said:

Donald Trump has faced multiple allegations of self-dealing, where he is accused of using his political position and business ventures for personal gain. Here are some notable instances:

1. Suspension of Anti-Bribery Law Enforcement

In February 2025, President Trump signed an executive order pausing the enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), a law that prohibits U.S. companies from bribing foreign officials to secure business deals. This suspension raised concerns about potential increases in international corruption and a "Wild West" environment for dealmaking. 

APNEWS.COM

2. Misuse of Charitable Foundation Funds

The Donald J. Trump Foundation was accused of engaging in self-dealing by using charitable funds for personal and business expenses. In 2018, the New York Attorney General filed a lawsuit alleging that Trump used the foundation's money to settle legal disputes and promote his political campaign. The foundation agreed to dissolve under judicial supervision, and Trump was ordered to pay $2 million in damages. 

FRANCE24.COM

3. Inauguration Funds Directed to Trump-Owned Properties

Following Trump's inauguration in 2017, allegations surfaced that the Trump Organization and the Presidential Inaugural Committee misused nonprofit funds by overpaying for event spaces at Trump-owned properties, such as the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. In 2022, they agreed to pay $750,000 to settle these allegations with the District of Columbia. 

CBSNEWS.COM

4. Favoritism Towards Associates

In February 2025, President Trump pardoned former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and suspended prosecution against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. These actions, along with the firing of the Office of Government Ethics director and ceasing enforcement of the FCPA, have been criticized as moves that effectively legalize bribery and corruption benefiting Trump and his allies. 

THEATLANTIC.COM

5. Conflicts of Interest in Foreign Policy

Trump's policies towards Ukraine, including recognizing Russian control over Ukrainian territory and denying Ukraine NATO membership, have been criticized for undermining NATO and empowering Russia. These actions have raised concerns about potential personal or political motivations influencing foreign policy decisions. 

THEGUARDIAN.COM

These instances highlight concerns about the blending of personal interests with official duties during Trump's tenure.

Recent Allegations of Self-Dealing in the Trump Administration

theatlantic.com

Trump Says the Corrupt Part Out Loud

4 days ago

apnews.com

Trump's halt of US law banning business bribes abroad raises specter of a 'Wild West' of dealmaking

4 days ago

theguardian.com

Donald Trump's betrayal of Ukraine has emboldened Vladimir Putin and pulled the rug from under Nato allies

Today

Sources

ChatGPT said:

Elon Musk is a highly influential and controversial figure, known for his leadership in companies like Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, The Boring Company, and X (formerly Twitter). His ventures span electric vehicles, space exploration, artificial intelligence, and social media, often sparking debates about innovation, ethics, and power.

Are you interested in his business strategies, controversies, political influence, or something else?

You said:

controversies, political influence,

ChatGPT said:

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and owner of X (formerly Twitter), has been a central figure in numerous controversies and has wielded significant political influence, particularly in recent years.

Controversies

Royal Society Expulsion Debate: The Royal Society is set to discuss the potential expulsion of Musk due to his controversial political positions, such as support for Donald Trump, downplaying climate change, and attacks on scientists. An open letter signed by over 2,300 scientists accuses Musk of undermining scientific research. 

THETIMES.CO.UK

Protests Against Tesla: Nationwide protests have erupted at Tesla showrooms in response to Musk's extensive cost-cutting measures and perceived undue influence over the federal government through his role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Demonstrators express concerns over civil servant dismissals, support for far-right political groups, and interference in foreign governments. 

FT.COM

Personal Disputes: Conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair publicly urged Musk to finalize their co-parenting agreement for their five-month-old child, expressing frustration over his lack of acknowledgment and engagement. 

PEOPLE.COM

Legal Challenges: Musk faces lawsuits alleging he has amassed substantial government power without proper accountability through his role in DOGE, potentially breaching the Constitution's appointments clause. 

POLITICO.COM

Tensions Within the White House: Musk's unconventional methods and lack of communication in his government role have caused friction among senior White House officials, leading to concerns about his uncoordinated and secretive approach. 

REUTERS.COM

Political Influence

Support for Far-Right Movements: Musk's political engagement has escalated, notably through his support for Donald Trump's 2024 presidential bid, encompassing financial backing and online promotion. 

TECH-CHAMPION.COM

Global Political Footprint: Musk's influence extends internationally, with his business ventures intersecting with political strategies and regulatory challenges, including tensions with European regulators over data privacy. 

CEOTODAYMAGAZINE.COM

These instances highlight Musk's complex and often contentious role in both business and politics, reflecting his significant impact on contemporary societal dynamics.

Recent Developments in Elon Musk's Controversies and Political Influence

thetimes.co.uk

Royal Society to debate expelling 'Bond villain' Elon Musk

Today

ft.com

Protesters target Tesla showrooms over Elon Musk's cost-cutting

Today

politico.com

They're not just suing to stop DOGE. They're suing Elon Musk himself.

Yesterday

 

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

https://chatgpt.com/c/67b12c80-9c84-8007-a861-622f800638cd

Self - Dealing in Pollieics Described by DeepSeek

 

Self - Dealing in Pollieics

“We must especially beware of that small group of selfish men who would clip the wings of the American eagle in order to feather their own nests.” -FDR, 1941

Self Dealing in Pollieics

Self-dealing in politics refers to a situation where a public official or politician uses their position of power for personal gain, often at the expense of the public interest. This unethical behavior can take many forms and is generally considered a conflict of interest or corruption. Here are some common examples of self-dealing in politics:

1. Nepotism

Definition: Favoring family members or close associates by giving them jobs, contracts, or other benefits.

Example: A politician appoints a relative to a high-paying government position despite the lack of qualifications.

2. Kickbacks and Bribes

Definition: Accepting money or favors in exchange for awarding contracts, passing legislation, or making decisions that benefit a specific individual or company.

Example: A politician receives a bribe from a corporation in return for granting them a lucrative government contract.

3. Misuse of Public Funds

Definition: Using taxpayer money for personal expenses or projects that primarily benefit the politician or their associates.

Example: A public official diverts funds intended for public infrastructure to finance a private business venture.

4. Insider Trading

Definition: Using confidential information gained through a political position to make financial gains in the stock market or other investments.

Example: A politician buys or sells stocks based on non-public information about upcoming policy changes.

5. Favoritism in Contract Awards

Definition: Awarding government contracts to friends, family, or businesses in which the politician has a financial interest.

Example: A mayor awards a construction contract to a company owned by a close friend, bypassing a more qualified bidder.

6. Exploiting Public Resources

Definition: Using government property, staff, or resources for personal use.

Example: A politician uses government vehicles or staff for personal errands or vacations.

7. Influence Peddling

Definition: Using one's political influence to benefit private interests in exchange for money or favors.

Example: A legislator pushes for a law that benefits a specific industry in return for campaign donations or personal gifts.

8. Revolving Door Practices

Definition: Politicians or public officials leaving office to take high-paying jobs in industries they previously regulated or oversaw.

Example: A former energy regulator joins a fossil fuel company and uses their insider knowledge to influence policy in the company's favor.

Consequences of Self-Dealing

Erosion of Public Trust: Self-dealing undermines confidence in government institutions and leaders.

Inequality and Injustice: It perpetuates unfair advantages for the powerful at the expense of the general public.

Legal Repercussions: In many countries, self-dealing is illegal and can result in fines, imprisonment, or disqualification from public office.

Preventing Self-Dealing

To combat self-dealing, governments and institutions often implement measures such as:

Transparency Laws: Requiring politicians to disclose financial interests and potential conflicts of interest.

Ethics Committees: Overseeing the conduct of public officials.

Whistleblower Protections: Encouraging individuals to report unethical behavior without fear of retaliation.

Strict Penalties: Enforcing laws that punish self-dealing and corruption.

Self-dealing is a significant challenge in politics, and addressing it requires vigilance, accountability, and a commitment to ethical governance.

Gemini says, Intelltgent people invest thier focus and others seek distraction.

 

Intelltgent people invest thier focus and others seek distraction.

This statement highlights a core difference in how people approach their goals and lives. Here's a breakdown of its meaning:

Intelligent People Invest Their Focus: This suggests that intelligent individuals understand the value of concentrated attention. They intentionally direct their energy towards areas that align with their goals, whether it's learning, problem-solving, building relationships, or achieving professional success. They are proactive in managing their attention and minimizing distractions. The word "invest" implies a deliberate and strategic allocation of focus, expecting a return in the form of knowledge, skills, or achievements.

Others Seek Distraction: This indicates that a significant portion of people tend to gravitate towards activities that offer immediate gratification or a temporary escape from their responsibilities, challenges, or even boredom. "Distraction" implies a deviation from a productive or meaningful path. This could manifest in excessive social media use, mindless entertainment, or avoidance of difficult tasks. While occasional breaks are necessary, the key difference lies in the seeking of distraction as a primary mode of engagement, hindering progress and personal development.

In Essence:

The statement contrasts two fundamentally different mindsets and behavioral patterns:

The Proactive, Goal-Oriented Mindset: This mindset prioritizes focus and deliberate action to achieve specific objectives.

The Reactive, Avoidance-Oriented Mindset: This mindset prioritizes immediate gratification and avoids discomfort or challenging situations, often leading to procrastination and a lack of fulfillment.

Further Considerations:

Definition of "Intelligent": The statement implicitly defines "intelligent" not just as intellectual capacity, but also as the ability to make wise choices and effectively manage one's resources (including attention).

Not Mutually Exclusive: It's important to note that these are not necessarily mutually exclusive categories. Even highly intelligent people can occasionally fall prey to distractions. The crucial factor is the predominant tendency and awareness of these patterns.

Impact of Environment: The modern world is designed to be distracting. It takes conscious effort and discipline to resist the constant stream of notifications, entertainment, and superficial information.

Actionable Insight: The statement serves as a reminder to assess how we are spending our time and attention. Are we investing in activities that contribute to our goals, or are we simply seeking distraction from discomfort or boredom? It encourages us to be more mindful of our choices and proactively manage our focus.

Perplexity says, intelltgent people invest thier focus and others seek distraction

 

Intelltgent people invest thier focus and others seek distraction.

You've touched on a fascinating dichotomy in how people approach their lives and allocate their attention. Here's a breakdown of the contrast between focusing like an intelligent person and seeking distraction:

Intelligent Focus

Purposeful Attention: Intelligent individuals tend to direct their focus intentionally. They identify goals, prioritize tasks that align with those goals, and then dedicate their mental energy accordingly. This is about being proactive rather than reactive.

Deep Work: The ability to engage in deep, concentrated work, free from distractions, is a hallmark of intellectual productivity. This allows for a deeper understanding of complex issues and the creation of innovative solutions.

Continuous Learning: Intelligent people are often lifelong learners. They focus on acquiring new knowledge and skills, seeing it as an investment in their future.

Mindfulness and Reflection: They understand the importance of being present and reflective. This involves paying attention to their thoughts and emotions without judgment, allowing them to make more informed decisions.

Delayed Gratification: They are willing to delay immediate gratification in pursuit of long-term goals. This requires discipline and the ability to resist impulsive behaviors.

Seeking Distraction

Avoidance: Distraction often serves as a way to avoid uncomfortable feelings, challenging tasks, or difficult situations. It's a form of escapism.

Instant Gratification: The allure of distraction lies in its immediate reward. Social media, entertainment, and other forms of stimulation provide a quick dopamine hit, but often at the expense of productivity and long-term goals.

Lack of Focus: A constant pursuit of distraction can lead to a fragmented attention span, making it difficult to concentrate on anything for an extended period.

Procrastination: Distraction is a common tool for procrastination. By engaging in distracting activities, people can avoid starting or completing tasks that they find unpleasant or overwhelming.

Superficial Engagement: Distraction often leads to superficial engagement with the world. Instead of delving deep into subjects of interest, individuals may skim the surface, never truly grasping the complexities and nuances.

In essence, intelligent individuals invest their mental energy strategically, while those who seek distraction dissipate their attention on fleeting pleasures.

Related

How do intelligent people manage their focus in a distracting world

What strategies do successful investors use to stay focused

How can one balance focus and distraction in their daily routine

What are the psychological traits of people who maintain focus

How does focus impact investment decisions

ChatGPT says, intelltgent people invest thier focus and others seek distraction

 

Intelltgent people invest thier focus and others seek distraction.

That's a powerful observation. It suggests that intelligent people prioritize deep work, mindfulness, and meaningful pursuits, while others may use distractions as an escape or a coping mechanism. Focus is a valuable asset—where you invest it determines the quality of your thoughts, actions, and ultimately, your life.

DeepSeek says, intelltgent people invest thier focus and others seek distraction

 

Intelltgent people invest thier focus and others seek distraction.

Intelligent people often invest their focus on activities and pursuits that align with their long-term goals, personal growth, and meaningful endeavors. They prioritize tasks that require deep thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, often seeking to maximize their time and energy on what truly matters. This might include:

Learning and Self-Improvement: They dedicate time to acquiring new skills, reading, or engaging in educational activities.

Goal-Oriented Work: They focus on projects or tasks that contribute to their personal or professional aspirations.

Mindful Reflection: They spend time reflecting on their actions, decisions, and experiences to gain insights and improve.

Building Relationships: They invest in meaningful connections with others, fostering collaboration and mutual growth.

On the other hand, some people seek distraction as a way to avoid discomfort, boredom, or challenging tasks. Distractions can provide temporary relief but often lead to procrastination, wasted time, and a lack of fulfillment. Common distractions include:

Social Media: Scrolling endlessly without purpose.

Entertainment: Binge-watching shows or playing games excessively.

Gossip or Drama: Engaging in trivial conversations or conflicts.

Mindless Activities: Spending time on tasks that don’t contribute to personal growth or goals.

The key difference lies in intentionality. Intelligent individuals tend to be deliberate about how they allocate their attention, while those who seek distraction may struggle with focus or lack clarity about their priorities. Cultivating mindfulness and setting clear goals can help shift from distraction to purposeful focus.

Sting ~ The Hounds Of Winter ~ Mercury Falling (HQ Audio)

Sting ~ The Hounds Of Winter ~ Mercury Falling (HQ Audio)

https://youtu.be/rw1UnY7ye_U

 

The Hounds Of Winter

Song by

Sting

Mercury falling

I rise from my bed

Collect my thoughts together

I have to hold my head

It seems that she's gone

And somehow I am pinned by

The Hounds of Winter

Howling in the wind

I walk through the day

My coat around my ears

I look for my companion

I have to dry my tears

It seems that she's gone

Leaving me too soon

I'm as dark as December

I'm as cold as the Man in the Moon

I still see her face

As beautiful as day

It's easy to remember

Remember my love that way

All I hear is that lonesome sound

The Hounds of Winter

They follow me down

I can't make up the fire

The way that she could

I spend all my days

In the search for dry wood

Board all the windows and close the front door

I can't believe she won't be here anymore

I still see her face

As beautiful as day

It's easy to remember

Remember my love that way

All I hear is that lonesome sound

The Hounds of Winter

They follow me down

A season for joy

A season for sorrow

Where she's gone

I will surely, surely follow

She brightened my day

She warmed the coldest night

The Hounds of Winter

They got me in their sights

I still see her face

As beautiful as day

It's easy to remember

Remember my love that way

All I hear is that lonesome, lonesome sound

The Hounds of Winter

They harry me down

Songwriters: Gordon Matthhew Sumner. For non-commercial use only.

The Hidden Price of Pleasure in the Modern World | Aldous Huxley

 

The Hidden Price of Pleasure in the Modern World | Aldous Huxley

https://youtu.be/YG7--yRQl6w

Simone De Beauvoir says,

"Life is occupied in both perpetuating itself and in surpassing itself; if all it does is maintain itself, then living is only not dying, and human existence is indistinguishable from an absurd vegetation; a life justifies itself only if its effort to perpetuate itself is integrated into its surpassing and if this surpassing has no other limits than those which the subject assigns himself."

Simone De Beauvoir 

Plato's cave analysis

How to understand Plato. Animated analysis of Plato's cave in Book 7 of THE REPUBLIC with reference to the Meno (anamnesis and the discussion on the difference between true belief and true knowledge); the theory of forms.

 

https://youtu.be/axARKd24eHo?si=HDsPji9erCTfvRx0

How to write a better Essay- and how to do Harvard Referencing

How to write a better #essay- and how to do #Harvard Referencing

Details about transition words and phrases, Latin tags and the order used for citing references

#HowToWriteAnEssay #essay #harvardReferencing

 https://youtu.be/6MRhN32gJnM?si=wXf51_1GjW19t4km

How to write a good essay

 

How to write an essay- brief essays and use the principles to expand to longer essays/ even a thesis you might also wish to check the video on Interview technique (now on this channel too!)and my new video on essay writing and Harvard Referencing here    • How to write a better #essay- and how...   #essay #essaywriting #professorTim #5paragraphs #quotations #university #school #english

https://youtu.be/liyFKUFCQno?si=BXDr90O3n8X4OWj-

Why you’ll never “get on top of everything” | Oliver Burkeman

  

Why you’ll never “get on top of everything” | Oliver Burkeman  

Many of us wake up each morning with something Oliver Burkeman calls “productivity debt.” The bestselling author and journalist explains this term as “a sense that you've got to work really hard during the day to pay off this debt of getting things done. Otherwise, you won't quite feel like you're an adequate and acceptable human being.”

It's becoming very obvious that this ever-accelerating treadmill of productivity  isn't going to lead to a final, perfect destination There will always be more to do. You're never going to feel completely ready. You're never going to be able to feel confident about what's coming in the future. 

If you set out on some big project of scheduling your time very, very, very strictly, not only will you probably fail and get very stressed, but even if you succeed, you'll fail in a way because there'll be some lack of spontaneity to that path, a sense of having to carry out these instructions that you've given yourself that is at odds with what we really value from being alive. And so that's why we need a way of understanding and thinking about work and productivity that does not treat getting on top of everything as the goal, explains Burkeman. Here, he lays out four guiding principles to lead a better, more fulfilling life.

https://youtu.be/-LMaT4rUdG4

Bia Ferreira e Caru Bonifácio - Negra tinta (cover)

 

Bia Ferreira e Caru Bonifácio - Negra tinta (cover)

https://youtu.be/AdT6v6cIUOc